Sunday, 17 November 2013

Delving into game theory

Just before I go to bed most nights when I'm not washing up mountains of dishes or completing visual design tasks I take a look at my e-books and industry websites like Gamasutra to get to grips with all different aspects of creating video games. I have a keen interest in the design process behind making games and looking at different mechanics in these and how they have evolved over the years is interesting. Here I will highlight a couple of things I have looked at recently which has inspired me:

http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/ChrisNonis/20130310/188193/RPG_Systems_and_two_Schools_of_thought.php

This article on Gamasutra explains the distinction to approaches to RPG design: Deterministic and Abstract. An RPG can use a combination of these two different approaches to achieve a unique 'feel' for the game.

An abstract approach is more based around more arbitrary gameplay systems which are balanced first and given context and form later. They are essentially more driven on things like hit points and magic values. Games like Final Fantasy and World Of Warcraft tend to use this approach where each monster is just a collection of hit points with weaknesses and strengths to certain elements. Gameplay elements are added in for the sake of improving and balancing the game rather than trying to copy reality.

A deterministic approach is when the gameplay mechanics used are part of the fiction of the world. This is used in traditional RPGs where creatures like trolls would have huge strength values that are out of proportion to everything else adding depth to the game world by showing how tough the trolls actually are, the imbalance in the gameplay creates a narrative and adds to the story. This allows for more freedom in terms of world building but makes it a lot harder to balance the game, especially if the game mentioned has a multiplayer mode.

A combination of these would have to be mastered for creating a unique and engaging RPG. The gameplay would have to be balanced and cohesive while still having a sense of place in the world. Some modern RPGs have started to do this well like Skyrim but there is still a lot that can be done to tangle these two systems together and create a more immersive game.

Earthbound (Mother 2)

This is a game that I have come across a few times in my research into games. Released for the SNES in America in 1995 it became a cult classic for it's parody of american culture and of the RPG genre.

It was unique at the time for being an RPG set in a modern world setting and for having no overworld map and being entirely seamless. It also doesn't have random battles like other RPGs at the time and its predecessor. The feature I like about it in particular though is the fact that it has a rolling hit point counter which means if the enemy deals a devastating blow to your character then you have a little time before the hp counts down to zero to either heal or make a last ditch attack which adds a little bit of panic and urgency to battles.


I am really inspired by Earthbound's setting and mechanics. The modern world setting is something that appears fairly commonly in RPGs now but most still tend to lack a humourous side seen in more classic games. In Earthbound the story is about children growing up but there is a lot of dark themes and subtext within the games plot like police brutality, terrorist cults and sexual crimes which aren't noticable at first glance. Here is a video by the Game Theorists that shows some examples:



Anyway there's just a couple of things I've looked at, soon I might get to a playthrough of Earthbound so I can share a proper opinion on the game (It's on the top of my playlist at the moment with The Last Of Us) I am also looking into game and level design principles at the moment so I would post with my thoughts on that in due course...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Leave a comment, I'll try and get back to you soon as possible. ^.^